The transition to adulthood is an intimidating prospect for all teens and young adults. But for older youth in foster care it means more than just branching out on their own. It means the end of programs, case workers, and foster homes that were tasked with providing for their basic needs. As a society, we support our youth in foster care wi
th services, programs, and financial assistance, yet at the point at which they are expected to become a contributing member to our society, that support is taken away.
Whether you call it aging out, emancipating, graduating, or transitioning, leaving foster care and being thrust into the world at large can be a scary and dangerous experience, and the research reflects this. Former foster youth are more likely to become homeless and less likely to attend college. They are also more likely to use drugs and less likely to find employment.
This collection explores the barriers and obstacles faced by youth aging out, as well as some of the organizations and opportunities offering pre- and post-emancipation support. It includes work on housing, education, health, and permanency. The research shows that aging out of foster care can be a minefield, but it also provides hopeful glimpses of how young people might navigate those minefields more safely.
 |
AdvoCasey: Fall 2001/Winter 2002, Volume 3, Number 2 (Aging Out of Foster Care)
Contributing Organization(s): Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
Publication date: 2001-12-14
| Complete listing and access info | Download
The Fall 2001/Winter 2002 issue of AdvoCasey focuses on foster teens in transition. It highlights what communities and child welfare agencies are doing (and not doing) to help them. It includes a fact sheet, case studies, and an interview with Gary Stangler, director of the Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Fact Sheet One: Defining Family Permanence
Contributing Organization(s): Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
Publication date: 2006-09-08
| Complete listing and access info | Download
Family permanence can substantially improve the chances for future success of all vulnerable children who come into contact with America's child welfare system. Family permanence ultimately can reduce the numbers of youth who enter care as well as those who "age out" of foster care without a family. Change will require new practices, adequate and fl exible funding, improved incentives for systems and individual families, and redefi ned goals and measures of accountability for policy makers and practitioners. Permanence is both a value and a goal of practice. For youth in state care to become successful and emotionally healthy in adulthood, they must leave the foster care system in a planned manner that connects them to a lifelong family. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Fact Sheet Two: Why Family Permanence is Critical for Older Children and Youth in Foster Care
Contributing Organization(s): Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
Publication date: 2006-09-08
| Complete listing and access info | Download
This fact sheet highlights statistics regarding older children and youth in the foster care system and what happens when they don't have a family that cares. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
A Family for Every Child: Strategies to Achieve Permanence for Older Foster Children and Youth
Contributing Organization(s): Annie E. Casey Foundation, The
Publication date: 2005-08-30
| Complete listing and access info | Download
In our research for this publication, we identified successful programs, policies, and strategies that have been helping older children find permanent families.We then examined how lessons learned from each effective program or policy change could be distilled into a number of action steps that others might follow. Finally, we created a series of overall recommendations and spelled out how advocates can learn from others to create an integrated system of programs and policies that will help older children and youth find permanent families. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
California Permanency for Youth Project 2006 Project Evaluation
Contributing Organization(s): California Permanency for Youth Project
Publication date: 2006-06-01
| Complete listing and access info | Download
This report describes CPYP's permanency work with several California county child welfare departments. It contains final outcomes for four pilot counties (Alameda, Monterey, San Mateo and Stanislaus) and a progress report on the ten counties that commenced the implementation of the project during the second half of 2005 (Contra Costa, Fresno, Humboldt, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo and Sonoma). Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
California Permanency for Youth Project 2008 Project Evaluation
Contributing Organization(s): California Permanency for Youth Project
Publication date: 2008-06-01
| Complete listing and access info | Download
CPYP began permanency work with four pilot California counties (Alameda, Monterey, San Mateo, and Stanislaus) in January 2003. After refining the project based upon lessons learned in these four counties, in early 2006 CPYP began working with ten new counties: Contra Costa, Fresno, Humboldt, Kern, Los Angeles (Metro North Region), Orange, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, and Sonoma (the "project counties"). The information included in this report pertains to the permanency work with these ten project counties throughout 2006, 2007, and early 2008. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Emancipated Youth Connections Project Final Report/Toolkit
Contributing Organization(s): California Permanency for Youth Project
Publication date: 2007-12-31
| Complete listing and access info | Download
This report presents findings and recommendations from the Emancipated Youth Connections Project, a model program designed to seek and sustain permanent lifelong connections for older youth who have already emancipated from foster care without a permanent connection to a caring adult. See "Part 3: Project Results" for project evaluation. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Model Programs for Youth Permanency
Contributing Organization(s): California Permanency for Youth Project
Publication date: 2004-04-27
| Complete listing and access info | Download
This CPYP publication reports on nine exemplary permanency programs throughout the U.S. and explains the critical elements of such programs. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Youth Perspectives on Permanency
Contributing Organization(s): California Permanency for Youth Project
Publication date: 2004-04-27
| Complete listing and access info | Download
"What do foster youth think about permanency?" CPYP, in partnership with the California Youth Connection (CYC), held interviews and focus groups with several foster youth to talk about this question. This document explores some of their answers. Complete listing and access info »
|
 |
Employment Needs of Foster Youth in Illinois: Findings from the Midwest Study
Contributing Organization(s): Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago
Publication date: 2010-01-01
| Complete listing and access info | Download
Far too many of the young people who age out of foster care in Illinois fare poorly in the labor market during their transition to adulthood. Since the John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence Program was created in 1999, it has been providing states with funds to help foster youth making the transition to adulthood achieve self-sufficiency. A major purpose of the program is to ensure that youth who remain in foster care until age 18 or older "receive the education, training and services necessary to obtain employment." Unfortunately, the limited research that has been done on young adults who "aged out" of foster care has found that their labor market outcomes are generally quite poor. This study describes what Illinois young people told us about their current and prior participation in the labor force, including work-related training or services they received. Throughout the report, we make comparisons between the young people who were under the care and supervision of the juvenile court in Cook County (hereafter referred to as the Cook County sample), and the young people who were under the care and supervision of juvenile courts in other counties (hereafter referred to as the Other Counties sample). Although most had some work experience, they had difficulty staying employed. Moreover, despite the fact that the percentage of young people who were working was greater than the percentage who were not, most of those who were employed were not working at a job that paid a living wage. The Foster Care Independence Act specifically mentions employment-related services and supports as being among the types of assistance that states should use their Chafee funding to provide. At baseline, when these young people were age 17 or 18, only 63 percent reported having received at least one service or support to help prepare them for employment. Unfortunately, the percentage of young people who reported receiving services or supports to prepare them for employment fell over time. Complete listing and access info »
|